xMOOC vs. cMOOC

I only learned recently that I’ve not been enrolled in MOOC classes at all, but have instead been involved with something called an xMOOC.

At first I was curious why anyone would want to eliminate the only saving grace of the MOOC acronym (its pronounceability), but apparently two variations are meant to distinguish the type of professor-centric massive courses that have received most of the attention over the last couple of years (xMOOCs) from a different vision for massive online education built around connectivity (cMOOCs).

Lest you think this distinction is just an attempt to glom onto MOOC media mania to push a different educational agenda, the connectivist vision behind the cMOOC actually pre-dates the Stanford experiment (and resulting initiatives from that experiment such as Udacity, Coursera and edX) by several years.

This connectivist vision is best explained by its visionaries such as George Siemens who talks about open online learning as emphasizing “creativity, autonomy and social networked learning” or Stephen Downes whose new book on connective knowledge describes learning this way:

Learning is the creation and removal of connections between the entities, or the adjustment of the strengths of those connections. A learning theory is, literally, a theory describing how these connections are created or adjusted.

If this all seems somewhat abstract, simply consider a massive class which is not centered on a single expert (the professor) transferring his or her knowledge to students.  Instead in a cMOOC environment the participants in the course act as both teachers and students, sharing information and engaging in a joint teaching and learning experience through intense interaction facilitated by technology.

There is an understandable appeal to this model (given that it mirrors the open vision of the web itself).  And I can understand why people who have been experimenting this area (and either creating or participating in courses built on the cMOOC vision) might look askance at newly popular xMOOCs based on traditional college courses that seem to be replicating the pedagogy of the low-tech classroom, but doing so in a way that eliminates the intimacy between a teacher and his or her students (who, within a MOOC, can number in the tens of thousands).

It would be best to have at least one course that follows the cMOOC model under my belt before commenting on its effectiveness as an alternative teaching strategy, but that’s won’t happen until after my sophomore year completes in June (presuming I can find such a course in my major – so far, the only ones that have surfaced seem to be education and technology specific).

Until then, some ground-level observations I can add to the debate (keeping in mind that they come from someone whose only had xMOOC experience) include:

1. While the courses I’ve taken are all based around a professor sharing his or her (actually, only his so far – a topic for another time) knowledge, I don’t think it’s fair to describe these all as just traditional “sage-on-the-stage” classes transferred to the Internet (a criticism implied when xMOOC are dismissed as glorified correspondence courses).  In fact, I’ve seen considerable experimentation within individual courses, which has led to considerable variation between them.

2. There is no doubt that teacher-to-student interaction is non-existent in all but a few xMOOCs, and student-to-student interaction (via shared forums, for example) is one of the weakest elements of my online learning experience so far.  But nothing prevents students from going beyond these existing tools and creating their own intimate communities (by taking classes in a group, for example, or building their own small online communities of committed classmates) to fill these gaps.

3. I’ve actually had experience in an online course where students were meant to teach each other (via “forced” interchange in an online discussion group); a course that had no lectures (just assigned readings and the aforementioned required interactions).  And even though this class was a graduate-level course with fewer than twenty students, I found the whole experience completely dissatisfying (even after doing all the work and getting a high grade).

4. The experience I just described made me realize that I like to be taught by a “sage-on-the-stage,” or, more particularly, by someone with way more expertise on the subject than I and my fellow students have who is also skilled and experienced at transferring this knowledge to others.  In no way does this mean that xMOOCs are inherently superior to cMOOCs on the same subject.  But it does mean that different options may be needed to meet the needs of people with widely varying strengths, weaknesses and preferences that make up their learning styles.

5. Which gets me to the key point that every aspect of the MOOC experiment (including what we end up calling the darn things) represent work in progress.  I have no doubt that the heavy lifting being done by champions of connective learning will help solve the problem of how to make huge scale a positive vs. a negative within massive online classes (check out this article for interesting ideas that are already brewing).  But I also expect that sages (or whatever you want to call the people who know the material and know how to teach) are not likely to leave the stage once the dust settles and we see what the next generation of online learning looks like.

, , ,

29 Responses to xMOOC vs. cMOOC

  1. Bob January 4, 2014 at 9:54 am #

    Interesting. Maybe I was blessed to have taken a course that was “exceptional”, but I’ve had a very different experience from what you’ve described in a couple of ways, both of the perspectives you identify in point #2:
    – “teacher-to-student interaction is non-existent in all but a few xMOOCs, and student-to-student interaction (via shared forums, for example) is one of the weakest elements …”

    Rice offered a Coursera “Introduction to Python” xMOOC that IMO provided a healthy mix of xMOOC and cMOOC practices. For example:
    – Material provided by the team of instructors (3 in all, plus TAs) included lecture videos with interspersed quizzes, separate quizzes to test retention, and practice exercises.
    – Each assignment was accompanied by a rubric for peer review and each student was required to peer-review at least 5 peer’s work providing both numerical scoring and comments. Peer review comments were generally very supportive and informative.
    – Student-created videos and exercises to illustrate technique were actively encouraged and facilitated by the teaching staff: i.e. each course section included video submissions to be voted on by fellow students.
    – Forums were run predominately by the students but monitored and contributed to by both the instructors and TAs. This practice effectively leveraged the wide variations in the level of knowledge and experience within our large MOOC community.
    – Students sometimes created and shared multiple solutions for an assignment after the due-date as a way of exploring the subject with peers.

    My overall take-away based on this experience is that both “sage-on-the-stage” and the “community” MOOC approach have value and can, and should, be combined effectively.

    Bob

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Post MOW 2013 reflections: MOOCs, museums and mistakes | View from a Blog - May 16, 2013

    [...] a MOOC. Additionally, there was a lack of understanding about the two types of MOOCs (cMOOCs and xMOOCs). Yet there is an almost tangible curiosity and interest in MOOCs- the technologies, applications [...]

  2. Responding to the MOOC hysteria | hblanchett.com - May 16, 2013

    [...] xMOOCs & cMOOCs. Is it possible to have a MOOC that’s not completely inflexible and impersonal? Yes – a connectivist MOOC. Pioneered by George Siemens  and Stepehen Downes  (among others), the theory is that knowledge is emergent, coming from students and staff talking to each other and reflecting, with #oldsmooc cited as an example. The delivery of c-MOOCs tends to involve a mix of web-scale methods eg twitter, blogs, bookmarking sites. Martin Hawksey provided a link to his blog post outlining various technologies used in c-MOOCs.cMOOCs tend to be smaller scale and involved talking to people and the formation of communities. David warned that cMOOCs are not a panacea – they are suited to advanced learners, who are comfortable online and used to sharing a lot of experiences online, which is not for everyone. In terms of pedagogy, c-MOOCs do tend to involve less transmission than in the xMOOCs, such as Coursera. (The term xMOOC was also new to me and I found this blog post on xMOOCs vs cMOOCs useful.) [...]

  3. Why the Georgia Tech-Udacity tie up is a big deal | authentic learning - May 20, 2013

    [...] when it was a very different beast to the one today. Siemens and his collaborators (the so-called cMOOC group) are critical of the private equity led xMOOC model because of its behaviourist — as [...]

  4. Friday Finds: Stuff I’ve Been Reading Online | the dirigible plum - June 7, 2013

    [...] a meaningful learning experience out of a Digital Humanities MOOC. Degree of Freedom teases out the differences between xMOOCs and xMOOCs and claims that sometimes learning from the sage-on-stage works best. Kris Shaffer has some ideas [...]

  5. Reflection on MOOCs | Learner Weblog - June 7, 2013

    [...] Here Jonathan Haber says: [...]

  6. SCONUL Conference and AGM 2013 summary | WHELF - July 16, 2013

    [...] note: Do you know your xMOOC from your cMOOC?; 75% of some MOOC’s users have a College Degree or higher qualification [...]

  7. Thought Leaders: Stephen Downes - July 24, 2013

    [...] Senior Research Officer for the National Research Council of Canada. Here Stephen touches on MOOCs (both the type C and type X variety), the intriguing concept of serialised courses, personal learning networks (PLNs), the ‘value [...]

  8. MOOCs, Mechanizations, and Machinations ~ Session C2 — Digital Rhetoric Collaborative - August 2, 2013

    [...] today calls for more creativity and flexibility, Chris Friend reviewed the potential of adopting cMOOC features into creating lessons that will “prepare students for life.” Friend thinks students [...]

  9. MOOCs plus big data | Nexus - August 22, 2013

    […] from amidst a large pool of learners, a goal at the heart of “connectivist MOOCs” (cMOOCs) that highlights peer-learning pedagogy. Combine xMOOCs and cMOOCs, and you can improve educational […]

  10. Open Online Experience - October 2, 2013

    […] http://degreeoffreedom.org/xmooc-vs-cmooc/ […]

  11. Netrules - Une histoire des MOOCs - October 7, 2013

    […] par Georges Siemens et ses confrères. L’université de Stanford a été le berceau des xMOOCs. Ses professeurs sont notamment à l’origine des deux principaux MOOC providers : Coursera et […]

  12. Researching cMOOCs and xMOOCs | Beyond the classroom - November 25, 2013

    […] Of Freedom, ‘xMOOC vs. cMOOC’ (April 19, 2013) [online] http://degreeoffreedom.org/xmooc-vs-cmooc/ [accessed 25 November […]

  13. Evolution of the MOOCs? | MEDIA PRAXIS - November 26, 2013

    […] quick loss of the cMOOC (which was Open) for our current xMOOC (“broadcast, amplified, online learning”; this is from Bill Meinke from Creative […]

  14. Evolution of the MOOCs? | FemTechNet - November 26, 2013

    […] from the Gates Foundation). • The quick loss of the cMOOC (which was Open) for our current xMOOC (“broadcast, amplified, online learning”; this is from Bill Meinke from Creative […]

  15. Heutagogy + Mentorship. | The Toolshed - December 2, 2013

    […] of the education industry that have been generating the most buzz: the MOOC (and, to split hairs, the cMOOC, not the xMOOC), the flipped classroom, and educational gaming.  (To be fair, Maria Montessori paved the path for […]

  16. Heutagogy, Moneythink Mentorship, and Our New Mobile App : Moneythink - December 4, 2013

    […] of the education industry that have been generating the most buzz: the MOOC (and, to split hairs, the cMOOC, not the xMOOC), the flipped classroom, and educational gaming.  It occurred to me that the phrase also aptly […]

  17. Hacking the MOOCs | Creative Amnesia - January 27, 2014

    […] courses” where “teacher-to-student interaction is non-existent” – see what degrees of freedom has to say on that) rather than cMoocs (“massive online education built around connectivity“) such as the […]

  18. What is your MOOCs Mood? | Etale - Life in the Digital World - January 29, 2014

    […] mood in a MOOC often comes from a critical mass of participants who’ve had a formative McMOOC experience. Those who no nothing other than cMOOCs can be quite friendly and welcoming, but people who were […]

  19. What lessons might we take from successful (and unsuccessful) OCL Institutional Innovations and from the concept of the Community of Practice (CoP)? | Mr. C - February 7, 2014

    […] Freedom, Degree of (2013). xMOOC vs. cMOOC. DegreeofFreedom. Retrieved from http://degreeoffreedom.org/xmooc-vs-cmooc/ […]

  20. MOOCs Industry Breakdown (Part 1 of 5) – What are MOOCs? | Jon O'Shaughnessy - February 12, 2014

    […] Reaction from Blogger on Personal Experience with Moocs – April 2013 Experience producing a Mooc from a Professor – Oct 28, 2013 Reaction from programming professionals on SAP MOOC – Oct 24, 2013 Blogger Discussing Academia’s Response to Moocs: Fear – May 13, 2013 Blogger’s Response to Mooc Completion Rates Article on Corporate Response to Moocs Negative Reaction from Academic Negative Response from HBS Professor […]

  21. Mooching around MOOCs | Ange's Scribbles - March 4, 2014

    […] found this blog post  http://degreeoffreedom.org/xmooc-vs-cmooc/ on http://degreeoffreedom.org who is attempting to complete a four year BA in one year through the […]

  22. MOOCs plus big data | mindmannered - March 12, 2014

    […] from amidst a large pool of learners, a goal at the heart of “connectivist MOOCs” (cMOOCs) that highlights peer-learning pedagogy. Combine xMOOCs and cMOOCs, and you can improve educational […]

  23. MOOCs of Every Shape and Size » Social Media Lab - March 19, 2014

    […] distance learners. Of course, this definition is not a catch-all as there is still a considerable debate over what makes a MOOC. There are basically two main types: cMOOCs and […]

  24. Books are Falling Apart – Hacking the moocs? - March 21, 2014

    […] courses” where “teacher-to-student interaction is non-existent” – see what degrees of freedom has to say on that) rather than cMoocs (“massive online education built around connectivity“) such as the […]

  25. Big MOOC, little mooc? | lawyerintoeducation - April 27, 2014

    […] cMOOC’, Degree of Freedom, an adventure in online learning, 29 April [Blog]. Available at http://degreeoffreedom.org/xmooc-vs-cmooc/ (Accessed 26 April […]

  26. I am a MOOC dropout | ditced - July 11, 2014

    […] “Drug constellations” task with its own Flickr site). But maybe I’d need to take part in a cMOOC for that. Still, I’ve learned a great deal and found these MOOCs a treasure-trove of neat ideas […]

  27. Hybrids rule, MOOCs drool | J. Michael Ramey - July 31, 2014

    […] Disillusionment” phase … as with other technological innovations, the rise of so-called xMOOCs was accompanied by over-inflated expectations. Some day MOOCs will find their happy place and the […]

  28. xMOOC vs. cMOOC | learningforinsight - August 27, 2014

    […] second site, Jonathan Haber’s DegreeofFreedom, provided a perspective much closer to my experience.  From the perspective of the individual, he […]

Leave a Reply


four + = 5